Governance & Leadership · GL-Q11

Question: Is there a formal link between governance reporting and the organization’s internal audit or assurance function?

Objective — Why This Matters

Audit closes the loop: controls verified, issues tracked, and lessons learned feed policy and design.

Maturity Levels (0–5)

0 — Unaware
No engagement with internal audit.
1 — Ad Hoc
Audit requests handled reactively.
2 — Defined
Annual audit plan includes cyber/privacy topics.
3 — Managed
Findings tracked to closure; status reported to committee.
4 — Integrated
Risk-based scoping; remediation verified; trend reporting.
5 — Optimized
Combined assurance model across 3 lines of defense.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Nominate audit liaison; share key policies and risk register.
1 → 2 Add cyber/privacy topics to audit calendar.
2 → 3 Use a central CAPA tracker; monthly status to committee.
3 → 4 Add root-cause analysis and control owner coaching.
4 → 5 Map combined assurance across lines (Ops, Risk, Audit).

People / Process / Technology Enablers

Evidence Required

Metrics / KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
CAPA tracker Spreadsheet/Issues Aging, SLA, owner columns.
Evidence Repo folders “Finding-ID/…” with closure docs.
Reports Markdown + PDF Lightweight templates.

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 9.2 internal audit, 10.1 improvement
NIRMATA Scoring GL-Q11 needs CAPA linkage + governance reporting.