Governance & Leadership · GL-Q10

Question: Are third-party risk and compliance updates presented to leadership periodically?

Objective — Why This Matters

Most breaches involve suppliers. Leadership needs regular visibility to vendor risk and actions to cut exposure.

Maturity Levels (0–5)

0 — Unaware
No vendor risk reporting.
1 — Ad Hoc
Only on big incidents.
2 — Defined
Quarterly list of critical vendors + risk ratings.
3 — Managed
Trends, open findings, expiring assurances.
4 — Integrated
Contractual remedies and re-classification decisions.
5 — Optimized
Continuous monitoring and joint exercises reported.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Build a spreadsheet of high-risk vendors with owners.
1 → 2 Add risk score, last review date, next action.
2 → 3 Include assurance evidence (certs, SOC2), open issues and due dates.
3 → 4 Track contract clauses/breach reporting; escalate overdue vendors.
4 → 5 Integrate continuous monitoring feed and drill results.

People / Process / Technology Enablers

Evidence Required

Metrics / KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Register Spreadsheet Keep it tight; filterable.
Evidence Drive/Repo Folder per vendor.
Monitoring RSS/Google Alerts For public incidents.

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO 27036 / ISO 27701 Vendor governance
DPDP Sec 8 duties of processors
NIRMATA Scoring GL-Q10 expects periodic leadership reporting + actions.