Awareness & Culture · AC-Q12

Question: Is the awareness and culture program periodically reviewed for effectiveness and improvement?

Why This Matters

A review cycle ensures the program evolves with new threats, business priorities, and user feedback.

Maturity

0 — Unaware
No review or evaluation of program effectiveness.
1 — Ad Hoc
Feedback collected informally after sessions.
2 — Defined
Annual review meeting scheduled.
3 — Managed
Metrics and survey results evaluated for improvement.
4 — Integrated
Review inputs from risk, HR, and incident functions.
5 — Optimized
Automated dashboards and continuous feedback loops.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Gather basic participant feedback.
1 → 2 Schedule annual review session.
2 → 3 Analyze metrics and identify gaps.
3 → 4 Include risk and incident data in review.
4 → 5 Implement continuous learning dashboard.

Enablers

Evidence

KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Feedback Google Forms Survey collection
Dashboards Metabase Trend analytics
Scheduling Google Calendar Annual review reminders

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO/IEC 27001 9.1 / 9.3 / 10.2
DPDP Act 2023 Sec 10 (Accountability Review)
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.MA / PR.AT
NIRMATA Mapping AC-Q12 closes the loop on culture program improvement.