Risk & Compliance · RC-Q11

Question: Does the organization maintain documented evidence of CERT-In reporting for notifiable incidents?

Objective — Why This Matters

Regulator notifications are time-bound and auditable. Clear evidence of reporting, acknowledgments, and follow-up actions reduces legal exposure and demonstrates due diligence.

Maturity Levels (0–5)

0 — Unaware
No documented process or evidence of CERT-In submissions.
1 — Ad Hoc
Reporting attempted but timelines and artefacts are inconsistent.
2 — Defined
Notification workflow documented with roles, timers, and templates.
3 — Managed
Submissions logged; acknowledgments and case IDs retained; post-incident actions tracked.
4 — Integrated
IR playbooks include regulator steps; dashboards show timeliness and completeness.
5 — Optimized
Periodic drills include regulator reporting; lessons learned improve readiness.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Identify reportable scenarios and required timelines.
1 → 2 Add CERT-In steps to IR workflow; create notification templates.
2 → 3 Maintain a reporting log capturing date/time, case ID, and attachments.
3 → 4 Integrate with incident tickets and metrics for timeliness.
4 → 5 Run tabletop exercises with simulated reporting and review outcomes.

People / Process / Technology Enablers

Evidence Required

Metrics / KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Log & artefacts Spreadsheet + Drive Central log; link artefacts and acknowledgments.
Workflow Trello / GitHub Issues Template card with checklist.
Metrics Metabase Timeliness and completeness tracking.

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
CERT-In 2022 Timely reporting and evidence retention.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident communications and coordination.
DPDP Act 2023 Breach notifications alignment where applicable.
NIRMATA Scoring RC-Q11 Level ≥ 3 requires logs, acknowledgments, and linked actions.