Privacy & Data Protection · PD-Q12

Question: Is there a continual-improvement and audit cycle for privacy and data-protection maturity?

Why This Matters

Regular review ensures the privacy program adapts to new laws, technologies, and organizational changes.

Maturity

0 — Unaware
No privacy audit or improvement activity.
1 — Ad Hoc
Reviews conducted only after incidents.
2 — Defined
Annual privacy audit scheduled with scope and checklist.
3 — Managed
Findings tracked with CAPA plan and ownership.
4 — Integrated
Metrics linked to risk and training improvements.
5 — Optimized
Automated maturity dashboards and external benchmarking.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Perform ad-hoc review after incidents.
1 → 2 Plan annual privacy audit with defined checklist.
2 → 3 Track findings to closure in CAPA log.
3 → 4 Integrate results into risk register and training.
4 → 5 Publish maturity dashboards and benchmark externally.

Enablers

Evidence

KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Audit tracking Odoo / Airtable CAPA management
Dashboards Metabase / Grafana Visual maturity trends
Benchmarking Excel models Year-on-year scoring

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO/IEC 27701 10.2 (Continual Improvement)
DPDP Act 2023 Sec 10 (Accountability & Governance)
GDPR Art. 24 / 32
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.MA / IM.ME
NIRMATA Mapping PD-Q12 sustains privacy program maturity.