Monitoring & Detection · MD-Q08

Question: Are monitoring and detection processes periodically assessed for effectiveness and improved using lessons learned?

Why This Matters

Detection quality declines if never reviewed. Periodic assessment aligns controls with evolving threats and operational feedback.

Maturity

0 — Unaware
No formal review of monitoring capability.
1 — Ad Hoc
Reviews after major incidents only.
2 — Defined
Annual self-assessment conducted.
3 — Managed
Quarterly effectiveness metrics and action plans.
4 — Integrated
External assessment / red-team testing included.
5 — Optimized
Continuous improvement with automated metric feedback.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Assign owner for monitoring review and document scope.
1 → 2 Perform annual self-assessment vs policy and standards.
2 → 3 Introduce quarterly metrics and track actions.
3 → 4 Engage external SOC assessment or purple-team validation.
4 → 5 Automate metric collection and trend analysis for feedback.

Enablers

Evidence

KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Assessment Open SCAP / Lynis Baseline control checks.
Tracking Odoo Community / Airtable Simple CAPA register.
Visualization Metabase / Grafana Trend dashboards.

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.10 (Improvement and Review)
CERT-In 2022 SOC Maturity Evaluation
DPDP Act 2023 Sec 10 (Accountability and Audit)
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.MA-1 / IM.ME-1
NIRMATA Mapping MD-Q08 completes Monitoring & Detection maturity cycle.