Bonus Question: Are network monitoring and alerting systems continuously tuned to detect anomalies or unauthorized changes?
Why This Matters
Monitoring ensures infrastructure health and rapid detection of deviations. Continuous tuning reduces alert fatigue and improves detection fidelity.
Maturity
No proactive network monitoring.
Basic SNMP or ping monitoring only.
Network performance and availability dashboards established.
Alerts linked to incident response workflows.
Behavioral and anomaly-based alerting implemented.
AI-driven analytics predict and prevent disruptions.
How to Level Up
| From → To | Actions |
|—|—|
| 0 → 1 |Deploy monitoring tools and define key metrics.|
| 1 → 2 |Set performance baselines and thresholds.|
| 2 → 3 |Integrate alerts with IR ticketing system.|
| 3 → 4 |Enable anomaly-based analytics.|
| 4 → 5 |Apply ML for predictive alerting.|
Enablers
- People: NOC Analyst, SOC Engineer
- Process: Detect → Correlate → Respond
- Technology: SNMP, NetFlow, AIOps platforms
Evidence
- Alert configuration exports
- Incident tickets and response times
- Tuning or false-positive reports
KPIs
- Mean time to detect anomalies
- Alert-to-incident conversion ratio
- Percentage of false positives reduced quarterly
Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)
| Purpose | Tool | Notes |
|—|—|—|
| Monitoring | Zabbix / Prometheus | Device health |
| Flow analytics | ntopng / ElastiFlow | Traffic behavior |
| AI Tuning | OpenSearch ML | Predictive anomalies |
Common Pitfalls
- Excessive untriaged alerts
- No feedback loop for tuning
- Alert fatigue causing missed incidents
Compliance Mapping
| Standard | Clauses / Notes | |—|—| | ISO/IEC 27001 | A.8.16 / A.8.28 | | NIST CSF 2.0 | DE.CM / RS.AN | | CERT-In 2022 | Section 14 | | NIRMATA Mapping | IS-Q23B reinforces Infrastructure Security with adaptive monitoring maturity. |