Bonus Question: Are DNS and DHCP services hardened and monitored for abuse or spoofing?
Why This Matters
DNS and DHCP are foundational network services. Compromise or spoofing can redirect traffic, enable exfiltration, or disrupt operations.
Maturity
Unsecured DNS/DHCP; no logging or validation.
Default configurations; reactive fixes.
Hardened configuration and basic logging enabled.
DNSSEC and dynamic update controls implemented.
Abuse detection and alerting integrated with SIEM.
Threat-intel correlation and anomaly detection automated.
How to Level Up
| From → To | Actions |
|—|—|
| 0 → 1 |Harden DNS/DHCP servers and enable logging.|
| 1 → 2 |Apply access controls and restrict zone transfers.|
| 2 → 3 |Enable DNSSEC and monitor updates.|
| 3 → 4 |Integrate logs with SIEM for alerting.|
| 4 → 5 |Correlate with threat feeds for spoofing attempts. |
Enablers
- People: Network Ops, SOC Analyst
- Process: Harden → Monitor → Respond
- Technology: DNSSEC, SIEM, Threat intel feeds
Evidence
- Server configurations and policies
- Log samples showing query validation
- Incident reports (if any)
KPIs
- Percentage of DNS zones signed with DNSSEC
- Average time to detect spoofing attempts
- Number of DNS/DHCP incidents per quarter
Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)
| Purpose | Tool | Notes |
|—|—|—|
| DNS server | Bind / Unbound | Enable DNSSEC |
| Monitoring | Zeek | Detect anomalous queries |
| SIEM | Wazuh / ELK | Central alerting |
Common Pitfalls
- No logging of DNS queries
- Zone transfers left open
- DHCP used without authorization controls
Compliance Mapping
| Standard | Clauses / Notes | |—|—| | ISO/IEC 27001 | A.8.23 / A.8.24 | | NIST CSF 2.0 | DE.CM / PR.PT | | CERT-In 2022 | Section 17 | | NIRMATA Mapping | IS-Q19B expands Infrastructure Security with DNS/DHCP integrity controls. |