Incident Readiness · IR-Q10

Question: Are recovery and restoration procedures validated after incidents to confirm systems return to a trusted state?

Why This Matters

Restoring systems without validation may re-introduce compromise. Controlled recovery ensures business resumption with integrity and confidence.

Maturity

0 — Unaware
Systems restored ad-hoc; no validation.
1 — Ad Hoc
Basic restoration from backups.
2 — Defined
Documented recovery and validation steps.
3 — Managed
Post-recovery verification and sign-off recorded.
4 — Integrated
Security validation part of BCP/DR tests.
5 — Optimized
Automated integrity checks and attestation reports.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Document backup and restoration paths.
1 → 2 Add verification checklist post-restore.
2 → 3 Require dual sign-off (Security + Ops).
3 → 4 Integrate verification into BCP/DR schedule.
4 → 5 Automate hash and integrity validation.

Enablers

Evidence

KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Backup Restic / Veeam Community Integrity verification
Validation Tripwire Open / Auditbeat Hash comparison
Automation Ansible DR test playbooks

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.21 (Availability / Recovery)
CERT-In 2022 Section 36 (Recovery Testing)
DPDP Act 2023 Sec 9 (Data Integrity Safeguard)
NIST CSF 2.0 RC.RP / RC.MI
NIRMATA Mapping IR-Q10 verifies secure recovery and trust validation.