Compliance & Audit · CA-Q11

Question: Is there a formal maturity-evaluation or benchmarking process for the compliance and audit function?

Why This Matters

Periodic maturity assessment helps prioritize improvement and demonstrates progress to management and regulators.

Maturity

0 — Unaware
No assessment of compliance function maturity.
1 — Ad Hoc
Self-evaluation done informally after audits.
2 — Defined
Maturity model adopted with criteria (people, process, tech).
3 — Managed
Annual maturity scoring and report to management.
4 — Integrated
Benchmarks shared across industry or frameworks.
5 — Optimized
Automated maturity dashboards and peer comparison.

How to Level Up

From → To Actions
0 → 1 Define criteria for maturity (e.g., NIRMATA levels 0–5).
1 → 2 Create evaluation template with weights.
2 → 3 Perform annual self-assessment and record score.
3 → 4 Benchmark against peer organizations or standards.
4 → 5 Automate scoring and trend dashboards.

Enablers

Evidence

KPIs

Low-Cost / Open-Source Options (MSME)

Purpose Tool Notes
Survey Google Forms / Typeform Collect scores
Dashboard Metabase Visualize progress
Tracking Airtable Improvement plan log

Common Pitfalls

Compliance Mapping

Standard Clauses / Notes
ISO/IEC 27001 10.2 (Continual Improvement)
DPDP Act 2023 Sec 10 (Accountability Review)
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.MA / IM.ME
NIRMATA Mapping CA-Q11 measures and benchmarks compliance maturity.